For adults with previously treated HR+/HER2− mBC

DATROWAY achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful mPFS benefit1

Median duration of study follow up was 10.8 months.2

Exploratory landmark data: The following analysis is descriptive only, as the trial was not powered to assess a statistical difference between treatment groups at these time points. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known.2

  • At 9 months, 38% of patients were progression free with DATROWAY and 19% with chemotherapy2
  • At 12 months, 26% and 15% were progression free, respectively2
Median overall survival1

18.6 months with DATROWAY and 18.3 months with chemotherapy

HR=1.01 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.22) Data was not statistically significant

DATROWAY showed a 36% ORR1

This bar chart chart compares the objective response rate of DATROWAY® versus chemotherapy
This bar chart chart compares the objective response rate of DATROWAY® versus chemotherapy

DISEASE CONTROL RATE

The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 75% for patients with DATROWAY and 64% for patients with chemotherapy2

Disease control rate at 12 weeks was defined as the percentage of patients who have a confirmed CR or PR or who have SD, per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by BICR.2

Median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI: 5.6, 9.8) with DATROWAY and 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.9, 6.8) with chemotherapy.1

ORR, DoR, and DCR were not tested for statistical significance. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known.1,2

PFS results were observed in all prespecified exploratory patient subgroups2

Swipe for more
This table depicts the consistent progression-free survival results observed in all prespecified exploratory patient subgroups
This table depicts the consistent progression-free survival results observed in all prespecified exploratory patient subgroups
  • Prespecified exploratory patient subgroups were not tested for statistical significance and not powered to show differences between treatment arms or between subgroups. Therefore, the clinical significance of these data is not known.2

Size of circle is proportional to the number of events across both treatment groups.2

aAsian=Patients from China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan.2